Broadband
-
Discussions about broadband caps and tiered or restricted services
-
ISPs providing broadband service
-
Online services, such as Hulu, Netflix Watch Now, Joost, and so on
-
A New Nail in the Video over Internet Coffin
Submitted by Shelley on Thu, 11/06/2008 - 09:55Two stories of interest this week.
The first story is about the FCC's decision to open the so called "white space" spectrum, to allow for new wireless services. This is good news for those hoping for more competition in the broadband market, and has been long anticipated by companies such as Google, Dell, and other companies. The decision wasn't without caveats. For instance, since wireless mics use the same spectrum, in larger cities, white space broadcast services cannot be located near stadiums or theaters.
This is about the only positive glimmer of news to those of us who also heard this week that AT&T is now testing broadband caps in the Reno, Nevada market. Broadband caps which will, most likely, be rolled out to the rest of the country early next year.
The caps are aggressive, too. For instance, Comcast set its cap at 250GB, but AT&T is looking at only 20GB for its lowest subscriber plan, and 80GB for its highest vanilla DSL account. You only get the 150GB cap the company mentions most frequently in the press releases, bundled in with the company's Uverse services.
How will this impact on services such as Netflix's WatchNow, which has also been so much in the news, recently? Especially with the new Netflix WatchNow HD offerings on XBox 360 and Tivo?
Netflix has stated that the broadband requirement for HD when using XBox is high—too high with these caps. Roku earlier stated that it wasn't worried about caps but that was back when we were discussing Comcast's 250GB limit, not the much smaller AT&T limits. Even with Roku's efficient techniques, we're looking at 1GB per hour for standard definition, probably 2-3GB for HD. This works out to about 1-2 hours of programming a night before hitting the broadband cap with AT&T, and that's not including other internet usage.
The caps AT&T are setting are so aggressive, that the lower end accounts will have to be wary of even accessing sites that automatically run a lot of video. They'll certainly want to pause before uploading a lot of photos, because uploads also figure into the broadband cap.
AT&T's move is the first on the part of a DSL provider, but probably won't be the last. It is a move that now ensures that entire markets have little or no choice when it comes to capped broadband access. Most people using AT&T are probably now wishing they lived in a Comcast region, because Comcast's caps at least give one a fighting chance at video over the internet.
A few major players haven't put caps on yet, including Verizon. However, it is only a matter of time before it, too, begins to cap. All of the major broadband providers provide entertainment services that directly compete with video over the internet—they're not going to allow this competition to occur without fighting it tooth, nail, and byte.
The news of AT&T's new caps is highly suspicious, coming on the tail of many new announcements about Hulu, Joost, and especially Netflix's WatchNow. AT&T's move can only be seen as saber rattling, in an attempt to foster uncertainty about broadband availability before the Christmas rush to buy Roku devices, or that new XBox 360. I don't know why AT&T doesn't just come out and say, don't waste your time on these boxes—the only option you have is UVerse. Why not give into the force?
About the only thing that can save video over the internet now, is if the companies who are dependent on the concept fight back at the broadband suppliers, or if new broadband options open up in the white space spectrum. Even then, I'm not sure that the newer players to the broadband market wouldn't begin already capped.
What do I plan on doing when I get hit with broadband caps? I plan on reading more. Access to books is the one thing the telecoms and entertainment companies can't restrict.
More:
Netflix sees Starz
Submitted by Shelley on Wed, 10/01/2008 - 08:57In a game altering play, Netflix has contracted with Starz to add the entertainment channel's movies to the Watch Now instant watching options AND to provide a live stream of Starz to the Netflix web site.
This means that highly rated first run movies such as Ratatouille and No Country for Old Men, in addition to older classics, TV shows, and other material, are now filling out the Watch Now queue. I spent a happy 20 minutes this morning filling up my queue with shows, and I've not even scratched the surface of what's available.
What makes this deal particularly intelligent on the part of Netflix is that it doesn't have to try to strike deals with every movie studio— it can just strike a deal with channel providers, instead. In addition, in an interesting move, Netflix also provides a live Starz stream you can subscribe to directly— allowing you to bypass the DVD queue, completely. This moves us closer to the Netflix dream of streaming content, only.
The hottest little digital device on the market has just become the inexpensive Roku box, with its ease of use and setup, and inexpensive price tag; especially when you consider that you can get a Roku box for about the same amount you'd pay for a month of cable service.
The Starz deal follows other breaking stories recently about Netflix making a deal with CBS and Disney, Roku providing an open SDK for others to build channels, in addition to Netflix releasing its API today. With the API, we'll now be able to integrate Netflix queues with other applications.
Of course, today's also the day that Comcast starts its bandwidth capping. How soon before this capping comes up against the new internet video capabilities is a toss up—but with Christmas looming, and Netflix streaming available in an attractively priced Roku box, in addition to being included in new blu-ray and game players, I expect a bandwidth show-down beginning next year.
In the meantime, I feel quite smug for having made my Roku purchase, before the rush.
State of Video
Submitted by Shelley on Thu, 09/18/2008 - 16:26A lot seems to be going on in the world of online video.
NBC and its affiliates have returned to iTunes, and brought quasi-HD quality with it. Welcome back to Eureka and Heroes, and in a much better quality than previous TV shows. ABC has also started rolling out shows in HD quality.
The move was paired with the release of iTunes 8, which hasn't necessarily been a smooth upgrade when paired with the AppleTV. The syncing between iTunes and AppleTV has generated some problems, and you can only purchase HD TV shows on iTunes—they're not available directly on the AppleTV.
Joost is now web-based rather than requiring a separate player. I'm trying it now, and the quality isn't too bad; about what you would find with Hulu and other lower resolution videos. No HD-like quality yet, but hopefully in time.
The streaming is a little rough, but that could also be a problem along the pipe. One advantage Joost has over so many other online video services is that it provides content for people in most countries, not just the UK, or the US. Of course, we all don't see the same content.
Still nothing yet from Roku as to when we can expect the additional content for the Roku player.
In the meantime, the first town to go all digital, Wilmington, North Caroline, has not imploded yet from the change, so there's hope for the rest of the world. The local news stations I pick up using an HD tuner have started to man phone lines during news broadcasts in order to answer questions about the conversion. It's still going to be interesting times when the switch is turned on.
Comcast Adding Caps
Submitted by Shelley on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 15:59According to DSLReports, Comcast is instituting a cap on its broadband customers. The cap will be 250GB a month, with one "freebie" month, where you can go over this amount without repercussion.
As caps go, this is one of the more reasonable. However, I expect to see other broadband companies following suit since one of the major players has now made a cap move. Eventually, this will most likely end up in front of the FCC, Congress, or court, as these companies will be forced to provide detailed operation information in order to assess whether they really have a congestion problem, or if their actions are anti-trust. This will also lead to questions about how much these companies reinvest profits back into infrastructure.
I also don't see how caps are going to overcome problems with congestion, because people could use most of their bandwidth allotment during peak times. Wasn't that the purpose of caps? To reduce congestion?
Consumers new Best Friend: Stop the Cap
Submitted by Shelley on Sat, 08/23/2008 - 00:54Stop the Cap! is a web site and weblog dedicated to the fight against broadband caps. From the Mission Statement:
We feel the current usage caps being considered by broadband providers are unreasonable, some moreso than others. Those below 10GB per month are outrageous. Others which may run above 100GB a month also represent a concern because of the future direction of the Internet. Consumers who exceed those caps may face immediate service termination or greatly overpriced “overage” charges for additional bandwidth, which we oppose. The industry’s marketing campaigns have always emphasized that among the benefits of subscribing is fast access to streaming video and audio, gaming, downloading songs and video, and other bandwidth intensive services. It should come as no surprise that customers have used their service exactly as their marketing intended.
From the Talking Points page:
Most cable systems plan to exempt customers from accessing content they own or control through their online portals. This represents an end run around Net Neutrality - a plan to allow big corporations to control the infrastructure and discriminating against the traffic they don’t own or control. Independent producers and businesses not affiliating with a cable company will have a hard time selling a business plan in a world where bandwidth caps make accessing those independent products and services prohibitively expensive.
There's considerably more at the site. Excellent. (via DSL Reports)
